º»¹®À¸·Î ¹Ù·Î°¡±â(ÇØ´ç ¿µ¿ªÀÌ ¾øÀ¸¸é À̵¿ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ½) È®ÀåµÈ º»¹®À¸·Î ¹Ù·Î°¡±â(ÇØ´ç ¿µ¿ªÀÌ ¾øÀ¸¸é À̵¿ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ½) ¼­ºê¸Þ´º·Î ¹Ù·Î°¡±â (ÇØ´ç ¿µ¿ªÀÌ ¾øÀ¸¸é À̵¿ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ½) ǪÅÍ¿µ¿ª ¸Þ´º ¹Ù·Î°¡±â
Á¾·ÎÇпø ÀÔ½ÃÁ¤º¸
ÀԽà ÀÚ·á º¸±â
URL º¹»ç 2006 ¼­¿ï´ë Áö¿ª±ÕÇü¼±¹ßÀüÇü ¸éÁ¢ ¹× ±¸¼ú°í»ç ¹®Ç×(¿¹½Ã)
ÀÔ½ÃÀÚ·á / 2006 / ³í¼ú 2008.07.07 Ãâó : Á¾·ÎÇʸ®¾Æ   Á¶È¸¼ö : 3966

¡à 2006Çг⵵ Áö¿ª±ÕÇü¼±¹ßÀüÇü ¸éÁ¢ ¹× ±¸¼ú°í»ç ¹®Ç×(¿¹½Ã)

¡á Àι®´ëÇÐ ±¤¿ª¸ðÁý
¡Ø ´ÙÀ½ Á¦½Ã¹®À» ÀÐ°í ¹°À½¿¡ ´äÇϽÿÀ.

The question of language and its political implication has exercised writer, philosophers and social theorists throughout the intellectual hiostory of western civilization. It is noticeable, too, that the subject has inspired extreme pessimism: from ancient Greece to Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four, (1) speech and writing have been creadited with a malign power to regulate human social relations in ways we are not aware of and to disguise important truths in a cloud of misleading rhetoric. ...(Áß¶ô)... (2)Why shouldn't this 'weapon' be appropriated by the other side?

1. ¹ØÁ٠ģ(1)¿¡ ´ëÇØ ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ ½Ç·Ê¸¦ µé¾î ¼³¸íÇϽÿÀ.

2. ¹ØÁ٠ģ(2)¿¡¼­ the other side°¡ ¹«¾ùÀÎÁö ¹àÈ÷°í, ¿©±â¿¡¼­ Á¦±âµÈ ¹®Á¦¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­ ÀÚ½ÅÀÇ »ý°¢À» ¸»Çغ¸½Ã¿À.

÷ºÎÆÄÀÏ: PDF ÆÄÀÏ
À̸ÞÀÏ º¸³»±âÀμâÇϱâ
´ÙÀ½ ±Û 2007 ¼­¿ï´ë ¼ö½Ã Ư±âÀÚÀüÇü ¸éÁ¢¹®Ç×(ÀÚ¿¬°è¿­) 2008.07.08
ÀÌÀü ±Û 2005 ¼­¿ï´ë Áö¿ª±ÕÇü¼±¹ßÀüÇü ¸éÁ¢ ¹× ±¸¼ú°í»ç ¹®Ç× 2008.07.07
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â